HAARP WEATHER CONTROL could be part of NWO DEPOPULATION PLAN, here’s the science.
Wednesday, January 11th, 2012 at
8:29 pm
I put this video together to show proof that US and Russia has been building and using weather control stations for many years. The US has 5 of these stations around the world now. Here’s the whole History Channel program: www.youtube.com
Tagged with: Control • could • DEPOPULATION • HAARP • here's • PART • Plan • Science • weather
Filed under: Youtube Videos
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!


Sorry this is not science and HAARP has nothing to do with weather control and neither does the Russian woodpecker both are military research arrays designed for either detection or communication or jamming.
Bad history channel bad!
These people are mentally handicapted. They do not think within the frame of God’s Creation.
Next Friday, January 13 2012, we will be staging protests across the country against SOPA the NDAA and overall the tyranny of the oligarchic government. Copy and Paste everywhere and spread the message to your friends family neighbors and co workers, If we are going to do this we need to be united. THUMBS UP SO EVERYONE SEES. COPY AND PASTE EVERYWHERE
I’ve read reports that Russia is about 60 years ahead of the US in HAARP broadcasting and weather modification and much of the old Soviet era research weapons have been leased to the Japanese Yakuza and the Aum Shinrikyo underground. They have been using these technologies in scalar warfare strikes and weather mod. & extorting world government officials. In March, 2004 they created the first hurricane ever in the southern Atlantic and also steered it in a loop. Google it.
All world is dream to destory russia ! but i wonder why??/
AWESOME! WHAT ABOUT EMP COVERT OPS??????
@MrPhantom19 Hahahahaah
D XoD
HEHEHE BOOLSHETS AND LUNATIC BLUFF PROPAGANDA CIA HARP INEXISTENT IN USA EXIST BOOLSHETS AND PROPAGANDA CIA CEENEY
@darkasmodeus1966 Not sure where you got your figures, but they are not only wrong, but they don’t take into account the gain of the antenna array.
I was an EE for 20 years with a heavy emphasis on atmospherics. Designed, built and managed communications systems that included microwave. One other big difference between you and I, besides the fact that you don’t know electrical engineering, is that I don’t have to use foul language to try to sound like an adult.
@tomperanteau YOU an engineer? From what fantasy academy? HAARP has an energie output of less 3.6MW - that is nothing in terms of weather-phenomena! Get yourself a brain (btw I am an engineer, so don’t try to fuck with me! OK?)
WHAT HAS MAN KIND COME TO, YOU CANT TAMPER WITH NATURE! NO WONDER THE EARTH IS PAYING US BACK .-.
Wood Pecker has nothing to do with HAARP you ignorant American cock suckers!!
@Troll196 Dickhead!
@Troll196 Someone copies a History Channel program, that’s illegal, youtube doesn’t want uploads of tv shows or commercials
@tomperanteau
I’m still waiting for the intellect to kick in and for someone to tell me, technically, why I am wrong. Your intellect seems to have run out early, as you have already started insulting my level of knowledge on radio science.
I’ll just continue to wait for someone who has the expertise to TECHNICALLY dispute my theory.
If the russians found the the brown tone we are lost xD
@LazyJones1 You can wear all the “tin foil” you want, if you can find any made of tin. That would not do you any good. If that is your theory, then you really do need to invest in some beginner’s books on radio wave propagation and engineering theory.
@tomperanteau
“HAARP is real and more than likely from the anecdotal evidence, is in use.”
Oh, yes.
But the good news is, a simple tinfoil hat will protect you!
Dispute THAT theory.
@twsinger2006 what do we put before & after this?
Sorry, I’m not to techy,lol
@Namnarooni I’m still waiting for the intellect to kick in and for someone to tell me, technically, why I am wrong. Your intellect seems to have run out early, as you have already started calling names.
I’ll just continue to wait for someone who has the expertise to TECHNICALLY dispute the theory.
@tomperanteau – You are either a con artist or a complete idiot… Either way… I wouldn’t waste my time… And I do have a masters in emag theory with a minor in communications and work with a host of other engineers who are even more qualified than I… We use HAARP as a typical lunch time topic when we need a good laugh…. This last sentence will be the last second that I waste on this. You deserve nothing more.
Thanks for posting this. After doing my own research on this issue, I can state, as a professional in the field, that HAARP is real and more than likely from the anecdotal evidence, is in use.
Anyone that does not think so should start by reading books on elementary electrical engineering. Couple that with a study of how the atmosphere/weather relate, and then come back and make informed statements. The data is out there on the GOV and EDU sites. Both engineering and patent data.
@Namnarooni A weak attempt to dispel what was presented. Perhaps you might delve into the engineering and tell us all why you don’t think this will work.
As a degreed engineer, I can tell you from looking at the research data, the patents, and other data available on government and commercial sites, that it not only works, but is being used.
Care to use calculations or science to dispute me?
@darkasmodeus1966 As an engineer (EE) with a heavy emphasis on atmospherics, yes, the energy needed to modify a small area of the atmosphere is calculable. You must also consider how much energy that HAARP produces and multiply that by the gain of the antennas. Much like a magnifying glass will multiply the sun’s rays to a point, these antennas have gain characteristics that multiply, by many times, the input.
Doesn’t take much to realize that it could heat and move the jet stream.
@RIFT123tutorials because they are f*** heads…